City of imagination
By Deborah Gans
In 1987, the League collaborated with the New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development to launch a design study on the potential of small-scale infill housing to contribute to the city’s affordable housing needs. The Vacant Lots project culminated in an exhibition and publication, portions of which are republished here on archleague.org.
In the following essay from the 1989 Vacant Lots publication, architect and member of the organizing committee, Deborah Gans contemplates the larger urban visions suggested by the design proposals.
While limited in scope to infill sites, many of the projects for Vacant Lots hold clues to an urban vision. Issues of style and composition alone do not exhaust their meanings. Each project carries in its form the expression of its architect’s imagined city — or city of imagination.
Some projects take their cue from their immediate context. Site 9 in particular generated buildings that almost replicate their neighbors in Jamaica. The frame houses of Marc Litalien and Noah Carter on Site 9 and the designs of James Tice and of Carolyn Krall for Site 10 are examples. Their responses might simply represent an extreme attitude of contextualism, or a kind of micro-regionalism, yet the question arises why this response is so closely linked to the Queens sites of free-standing houses. It seems that the participants accepted these existing types as the appropriate models. The pitched roof and porch carry with them an archetypal idea of dwelling. As in the city of Aldo Rossi, invention is tempered by the discovery of the true and the timeless. The city of imagination is derived from the city of fact and memory.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/241b3/241b3347fb28f3e7a906111c4b97a6504cdc12a2" alt="Anthony Pleskow, Mark Shapiro, Site 6 — "We are committed to quality housing conditions such as access to light, view, private and semi-private open space, to 'the essential joys' — <em>soleil, espace,</em> and <em>verdure</em>. Furthermore we want to maintain the spatial definition of the traditional city. At the urban scale, the street wall is maintained, and the additional height, generated by zoning that allows four units, is set back. At the rear of the site a "mews" building defines an articulated edge of the building and creates a semi-private open space which activates the existing block-through access way. Specific architectural elements such as stoops, porches, materials and openings are typologically related to existing conditions, thus reinforcing neighborhood character and life. The separate "mews" structure transforms the existing building typology. The private courtyard it creates provides views and daylight as well as greenery and shared open space for the residents. A service shaft and a stair tower, the latter providing access to upper-level units and a communal roof garden, link the two structures and activate the courtyard. A staggered building section promotes privacy across the courtyard, and the "mews" structure steps back, allowing light to penetrate. In addition to the court and communal roof gardens, balconies and terraces provide private open space. Duplex layouts give an impression of more generous space, as do the sight lines, which allow the resident to see through the entire length of the apartments on the living level. Kitchens, bathrooms, and stairs are located in a coherent zone adjacent to the side yard, giving them access to light and air. A simple and economical structural system employing load bearing masonry walls and precast concrete floor planks ensure the feasibility of this strategy." Anthony Pleskow, Mark Shapiro, Site 6 | click image for an excerpt of the project statement."
Anthony Pleskow, Mark Shapiro, Site 6
At the other extreme are projects in conscious contrast to their context. One mechanism of this contrast is the language of style. Often the style of modernism, for example, implements values of light, air, and circulation absent from the neighborhood. In other areas, where those values are already present in other guises, modernism becomes rhetorical. It can convey an optimism in man’s ability to solve the intractable problem of dwelling. On Site 6 Anthony Pleskow and Mark Shapiro use a canopy reminiscent of Le Corbusier’s entry at Villa Stein. Changed in scale and in relation to the path of the automobile, this canopy becomes a whimsical flag of the modernist program. In the project of 1100 Architects for Site 9, modernism is identified as functional elements that belong behind the scene. The rear of their house is raised on pilotis creating a covered parking area, while the front resembles its neighbors more both in style and in relation to the street. On Site 7, Tod Williams and Billie Tsien embrace the formula of “tower in the park” but redefine the park as a complex new path through the existing city.
Some projects neither reject nor replicate their context but quietly turn inward in order to focus on an internal composition. Here the long narrow site was instrumental in generating poetic solutions. Sites 1 and 8 border on the existing city for only twenty or so linear feet, while they stretch uninterrupted through the city block. The project of Michael Barratt for Site 8 presents two fronts — one on the street conforming to the established order, the other on the side, suggesting an alternative. The two parts of the Breslin/Mosseri project for a boarding house for Site 8 face each other across an open court which becomes the center of their internal community. In the backyard schemes of Jennifer Sage and the Ed Mills team, both for Site 1, the city becomes a web of secluded places, gardens or courts where the private imagination can run free.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d1ea6/d1ea6edb0f6e921c4846ca5c05e20f3fc807710d" alt="Edward Mills, Voorsanger and Mills Associates, Site 1 — "ISSUES OF ARCHITECTURE AND CONSTRUCTION As with all low-income housing, cost and quality of life are the primary concerns. With simple elements of construction and design, with economy of circulation and building materials, and with carefully scaled spaces, aesthetically conceived housing can be available for about $80 per square foot. <br><br>CONSTRUCTION 1. Simple construction methods allow for the duplication of similar building parts and for repetitive unit types. 2. Each unit proposed is sized and developed to take advantage of materials that can be handled by one or two laborers at a time. No heavy machinery is required for the building process; both labor and handling costs are reduced. 3. Large-unit glazed brick or split-face block or any other 8 x 12 x 4 inch cavity wall construction can be used. Wood joists span from party wall to intermediate wall, and from intermediate wall to party wall. 4. Interior bearing walls are constructed of the same masonry units as those on the exterior; sheetrock and other inexpensive materials are used for non-bearing partitions. <br><br>URBAN FABRIC 1. This lot in the Mott Haven district of the Bronx has two 33-foot street fronts, running 200 feet from 144th Street to 143rd Street. The unusually long, narrow shape makes it possible to capture mid-lot space for garden areas. The street façade responds to the surrounding urban fabric in scale and detail. Adjacent parapet heights, cornice lines, and front stoops are recalled and reinterpreted. It is imperative that such vernacular elements remain in order to preserve the scale and identity of the district. 2. These 'captured gardens' in the midst of a dense urban fabric permit the occupants, families and individuals, to experience both the richness of urban landscape and a serene and introspective world within the garden. 3. It is crucial that the housing participates in its urban setting and, through careful manipulation of public, semi-public, and private spaces, also conveys a sense of harmony, serenity, permanence, and beauty.<br><br>VILLAS IN THE GARDEN 1. A series of VILLA BLOCKS are linked and separated by 30 x 30 foot garden courts. 2. All public circulation is exterior in order to define the area of private enclosure and to simplify the building mass. 3. In the same way that single family houses are distinct, each individual villa is identified as a 'scale object' surrounded by a garden. Each villa block is placed so that it is linked with a particular garden. Procession through the site connects each garden/villa unit to the others. 4. The courts which are the gardens for the ground floor units offer a private and tranquil view of nature for the upper floors." Edward Mills, Voorsanger and Mills Associates, Site 1"
Edward Mills, Voorsanger and Mills Associates, Site 1
Other architects interpret the city as a hallucinatory experience and their projects as episodes in it. On Site 3, Yann Andre Leroy’s house is a billboard backdrop for a murder. On Site 2, in a quieter but still dark rendering, Daniel Rowen and Frank Lupo show us an empty city filled with only chiaroscuro and prismatic volumes in exaggerated perspective like plays on a de Chirico painting.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aa102/aa102b9b27c8117263a13cdc6a811c53d57d4e91" alt="Frank Lupo and Daniel Rowen, Site 2 — "Our intention is to create a building type that suits the needs of the family and promotes a collective identity. This premise establishes the following agenda: 1. that the apartments would be primarily two and three bedroom units with no studios and only a few one bedroom units; 2. that the open space required by the zoning regulations be developed into a significant outdoor space adjacent to all communal spaces in the building; 3. that a community room, suitable for a wide range of activities, be not only the largest space in the project, but also symbolically the most important. <br><br>The group of public spaces— the lobby, corridor, stair, terrace, laundry room, and community room — are all organized around the entry court. This space is open, but elevated from the sidewalk and separated from its neighbor to the east by a great wall of ivy. The adjacencies of these spaces promote a variety of interaction between parents and children, friends and neighbors. The design of this building is intended to provide its residents the opportunity to pattern their lives with choices generated by their 'home,' beyond those offered on the 'street.'" Frank Lupo and Daniel Rowen, Site 2"
Frank Lupo and Daniel Rowen, Site 2
Most of the architects do not envision their inventions for a single Vacant Lot as the normative solution for the construction of a total city, or even as repeatable. However, imbedded in these objects are ideas of urbanism. Collectively the proposals for Vacant Lots suggest a tension between the will of the architect and the city, between the force of composition and the resistance of a city which cannot simply be composed.